| Su | Mo | Tu | We | Th | Fr | Sa |
|---|---|---|---|---|---|---|
| 1 | 2 | 3 | 4 | |||
| 5 | 6 | 7 | 8 | 9 | 10 | 11 |
| 12 | 13 | 14 | 15 | 16 | 17 | 18 |
| 19 | 20 | 21 | 22 | 23 | 24 | 25 |
| 26 | 27 | 28 | 29 | 30 | 31 |
Development planning for Bahrs Scrub occurs in the modern context of anthropogenic climate change acknowledgement and awareness, biodiversity decline, and a burgeoning world and national population. Social, economic and environmental implications of the above are numerous, diverse and far-reaching; however a unifying thread is the global recognition that past human practices cannot continue without drawing the Earth, its resources, landscapes, and life forms, including the human species, to cataclysm.
Whether individuals and politicl parties choose to accept or reject the legitimacy of the majority of climate scientists who warn that there is an enormous and fatal risk that human activities are casuing rapid climate change, since 2007, the majority opinion of the world's nations is to address this risk. Consequently, nations will implement - or have already implemented - sweeping changes to legislation in relation to bringing down greenhouse gases and emissions reductions targets, albeit some more meaningful than others.
Despite the failure of world leaders at the United Nations COP 15 at Copenhagen in December 2009 to achieve consensus on a binding emissions reductions target, and despite our own government's difficulties in establishing a meaningful legislative approach to addressing the risks posed by climate scientists by introducing either an Emissions Trading Scheme, Carbon Price or other overarching system to effectively bring down greenhouse emissions, there is little doubt that some form of climate change legislation will be set in place for Australia in the near future. Even if Australia fails to implement climate change legislation, the requirements set in place for international interaction by many other countries in regard to their own climate change legislation will have ultimately a significant impact on the Australian economy and way of life.
So, regardless of whether we believe in anothropogenic climate change or not, regardless of whether the Labor Government ETS Scheme is passed or whether the Opposition version, or the Australian Greens' version is implemented, some form of legislation will soon come into place regarding emissions reductions.
For this reason, any project that causes a rise in greenhouse emissions will become extremely expensive. Conversely, any project that contributes to reducing greenhouse emissions will become lucrative.
The conservation of Bahrs Scrub forest will be a valuable asset for Australia, the State and Logan City under pending climate change legislation.
Allowing the destruction of Bahrs Scrub forest will result in very high greenhouse emissions mitigation costs to the Council and the developer; this signiicant cost will be passed on to the ratepayer and the consumer. Allowing this destruction would be a very short-sighted decision by LCC, which still has the opportunity to exercise good judgement and foresight, and recognise that the moral and monetary costs involved in developing Bahrs Scrub are much too high.
LETTER